Technology

Uncool Can Beat Flashy Tech

5Views
Spread the love


This text is a part of the On Tech e-newsletter. You may sign up here to obtain it weekdays.

One in all my missions is to get extra individuals to understand the wonders of uncool technology.

This isn’t solely as a result of I’m profoundly uncool personally, but additionally as a result of I fear that we fixate on whiz-bang know-how on the expense of much less flashy stuff that may make a profound distinction in individuals’s lives.

To offer you a story of two extremes: Thrilling helium balloons and unremarkable smartphones with the appear and feel of 1990s flip telephones.

The Info, a know-how information publication, wrote this week about Loon, a virtually decade-old venture from Google’s guardian firm to beam web alerts to distant locations utilizing high-altitude balloons that act like floating cellphone towers. The concept is thrilling. The balloons appear like rad jellyfish. However, uh, they won’t be working very properly.

The Info discovered that Loon had spent a bunch of cash together with on prices it didn’t anticipate like recurrently changing balloons — one thing that extra standard web supply choices don’t require. The Info identified some examples the place Loon balloons have been helpful, together with when Hurricane Maria destroyed cell towers in Puerto Rico.

My colleague Abdi Latif Dahir has written that critics of a Loon venture in Kenya mentioned it was an answer searching for an issue, as most Kenyans already had web entry by extra standard cellphone towers and fiber optic cables.

He and the Info article implicitly requested a profound query: Is flashy know-how higher and extra financially viable than cheaper, easier options? It’s a superb query, proper?

If fancy know-how isn’t inherently higher and could also be worse, what’s the choice?

I wrote final yr about two uncool applied sciences which have profoundly helped increase the number of people connected to the internet in poorer countries: Smartphones with easy software program and bare-bones components that value as little as $20, and cheap tools like solar-powered poles to carry web wiring and carry alerts to hard-to-reach spots on this planet.

(It additionally helps to have billionaires like India’s Mukesh Ambani who’re prepared to pour money and political persuasion into constructing web networks.)

A solar-powered telecommunications pole within the floor is boring to take a look at however is the results of some subtle know-how, wise enterprise planning and savvy politicking. These are the unflashy forces which have made a far greater distinction for much much less cash than helium balloons, Facebook’s failed internet-ferrying drone project and efforts to beam internet service from satellites.

That’s to not say that flashy by no means works, nor that folks and corporations shouldn’t dream massive. We’d like that, too.

However efforts to widen web entry utilizing satellites and helium balloons suck up consideration and cash that may be extra successfully lavished on seemingly boring infrastructure like laying extra thick coils of cables that carry our web information.

There’s a bent to obsess on grand fixes that will not repair something. Apps that try (and fail) to “modernize” an election get extra consideration than a simple election information website that simply provides voters what they want quick. And whereas some well being methods are splurging on creepy, possibly ineffective software to foretell sufferers’ coronavirus-related well being dangers, unfussy virus-exposure apps may also help individuals keep secure now.

We have to pay extra consideration to the uncool and the incremental. I want there have been MacArthur “genius” grants for pondering small.


I wish to discuss to you a few chart. A clunky one. It’s from Mark Zuckerberg, and it explains loads in regards to the complicated, shouty info we discover ourselves mucking round in.

In 2018, the Fb boss wrote a very long post that had two pretty profound explanations of human habits. First, he mentioned, individuals are intrigued by no matter is titillating, sensational and outrageous — usually even when they are saying they don’t prefer it. (I do love scanning the gossip magazines at my hair salon.)

And second, he mentioned, irrespective of the place Fb drew the road at exercise that went too far — harmful lies, bullying, requires violence, sexually suggestive pictures — individuals tended to submit materials that went proper as much as the road. They usually did that as a result of, once more, individuals discovered it partaking.

Zuckerberg even included that chart, which my colleague Kevin Roose tweeted on Thursday, to visually present that as materials on Fb edged nearer to breaching the location’s guidelines, individuals tended to work together with it extra. Zuckerberg known as this a “primary incentive drawback.” When individuals discovered “borderline content material” attention-grabbing and fascinating, that inspired them to make extra borderline content material.

The fundamental incentive drawback stays. We’ve talked about this loads: Outrageous, bombastic and generally unfaithful issues are extra partaking than the reality. We’ve seen that with the ocean of misinformation in regards to the U.S. election.

Politico lately published a ballot discovering that 70 % of Republicans don’t imagine the election was free and honest regardless of the shortage of credible proof to assist this view.

Fb, YouTube and different web firms usually are not solely responsible for the rubbish soup of dangerous info and conspiracies, which germinate from or are inspired by President Trump and other powerful people and establishments.

The way in which false election concepts have unfold has performed out as Zuckerberg described two years in the past. Kevin said it best: “Voter fraud conspiracy theories pushed by a sitting president are a much bigger drawback than social media firms alone can remedy, however man, rating info primarily based on how attention-grabbing it’s has penalties.”


  • Your tween’s obsession is an enormous enterprise, too: Roblox, the corporate that makes a Lego-like on-line recreation beloved by kids, launched monetary particulars that reveals it has gained many more users and revenue through the pandemic, my colleagues Kellen Browning and Lauren Hirsch reported. (Kellen has additionally written in regards to the young people who create Roblox add-ons, like digital clothes and mini-games that they promote to fellow Roblox gamers.)

  • This can be a massive milestone in leisure: Plans to launch the following version of the “Surprise Lady” film each in theaters and on HBO Max present that film theaters have misplaced their energy and that leisure firms are determined to make their streaming providers massive and quick, Peter Kafka wrote for Recode.

  • The other of “doom scrolling” is Zillow browsing? Individuals who “wish to flee not simply their properties however the actuality of 2020” are wallowing in online home listings to daydream about alternate realities, my colleague Taylor Lorenz reported. The Instances’s Nellie Bowles additionally wrote a hilarious confession earlier within the pandemic about browsing Zillow to fantasize a few totally different life involving an costly cargo bicycle or a yard rooster coop.

Badger the cat could be very annoyed at having so many fabulous outfits and nowhere to go to point out them off. (Due to our On Tech editor, Hanna Ingber, for locating this TikTok video and making me watch it 45 instances.)


We wish to hear from you. Inform us what you consider this article and what else you’d like us to discover. You may attain us at ontech@nytimes.com.

When you don’t already get this article in your inbox, please sign up here.



admin
the authoradmin

Leave a Reply

1 × 2 =